--- 1/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-02.txt	2011-08-17 14:16:48.000000000 +0200
+++ 2/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-03.txt	2011-08-17 14:16:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,28 +1,28 @@
 
 Network Working Group                                  Clarence Filsfils
 Internet-Draft                                             Cisco Systems
-Expires: November 5, 2011                                Pierre Francois
-                                                               UCLouvain
+Intended status: Informational                           Pierre Francois
+Expires: February 18, 2012                                     UCLouvain
                                                               Mike Shand
                                                            Cisco Systems
                                                           Bruno Decraene
                                                           France Telecom
                                                             James Uttaro
                                                                      ATT
                                                          Nicolai Leymann
                                                         Martin Horneffer
                                                         Deutsche Telekom
-                                                             May 4, 2011
+                                                         August 17, 2011
 
                     LFA applicability in SP networks
-                 draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-02
+                 draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-applicability-03
 
 Abstract
 
    In this draft, we analyze the applicability of LoopFree Alternates in
    both core and access parts of Service Provider networks.  We provide
    design guides to favor their applicability where relevant, typically
    in the access part of the network.
 
 Status of this Memo
 
@@ -32,21 +32,21 @@
    Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
    Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
    working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
    Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
 
    Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
    and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
    time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
    material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
 
-   This Internet-Draft will expire on November 5, 2011.
+   This Internet-Draft will expire on February 18, 2012.
 
 Copyright Notice
 
    Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
    document authors.  All rights reserved.
 
    This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
    Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
    (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
    publication of this document.  Please review these documents
@@ -101,21 +101,21 @@
    7.  Capacity Planning with LFA in mind . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
      7.1.  Coverage Estimation - Default Topology . . . . . . . . . . 27
      7.2.  Coverage estimation in relation to traffic . . . . . . . . 28
      7.3.  Coverage verification for a given set of demands . . . . . 28
      7.4.  Modeling - What-if Scenarios - Coverage impact . . . . . . 28
      7.5.  Modeling - What-if Scenarios - Load impact . . . . . . . . 29
      7.6.  Discussion on metric recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . 29
    8.  Security Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
    9.  IANA considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
    10. Conclusions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
-   11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
+   11. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
    Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
 
 1.  Introduction
 
    In this document, we analyze the applicability of LoopFree Alternates
    in both core and access parts of Service Provider networks.  We
    provide design guides to favor their applicability where relevant,
    typically in the access part of the network.
 
    We first introduce the terminology used in this document in
@@ -1393,21 +1393,21 @@
    node LFA coverage.
 
    A second objective consisted in describing the three different
    profiles of LFA applicability for the IP/MPLS core networks and
    illustrating them with simulation results based on real SP core
    topologies.
 
    Future versions of this document will cover additional access
    topologies and will describe multicast applicability.
 
-11.  References
+11.  Informative References
 
    [RFC5714]  Shand, M. and S. Bryant, "IP Fast Reroute Framework",
               RFC 5714, January 2010.
 
 Authors' Addresses
 
    Clarence Filsfils
    Cisco Systems
    Brussels  1000
    BE