draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design-00.txt   draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design-01.txt 
Network Working Group L. Fang, Ed. Network Working Group L. Fang, Ed.
Internet Draft Cisco Systems Internet Draft Cisco Systems
Intended status: Informational N. Bitar Intended status: Informational N. Bitar
Expires: June 18, 2012 Verizon Expires: June 20, 2012 Verizon
R. Zhang R. Zhang
Alcatel Lucent Alcatel Lucent
M. DAIKOKU M. DAIKOKU
KDDI KDDI
P. Pan P. Pan
Infinera Infinera
December 18, 2011 December 20, 2011
MPLS-TP Use Cases Studies and Design Considerations MPLS-TP Applicability; Use Cases and Design
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design-00.txt draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design-01.txt
Abstract Abstract
This document provides use case studies and network design This document provides applicability, use case studies and network
considerations for Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport Profile design considerations for Multiprotocol Label Switching Transport
(MPLS-TP). profile (MPLS-TP).
In the recent years, MPLS-TP has emerged as the technology of choice In the recent years, MPLS-TP has emerged as the technology of choice
for the new generation of packet transport. Many service providers for the new generation of packet transport. Many service providers
(SPs) are working to replace the legacy transport technologies, e.g. (SPs) are working to replace the legacy transport technologies, e.g.
SONET/SDH, TDM, and ATM technologies, with MPLS-TP for packet SONET/SDH, TDM, and ATM technologies, with MPLS-TP for packet
transport, in order to achieve higher efficiency, lower operational transport, in order to achieve higher efficiency, lower operational
cost, while maintaining transport characteristics. cost, while maintaining transport characteristics.
The use cases for MPLS-TP include Metro Ethernet access and The use cases for MPLS-TP include Metro Ethernet access and
aggregation, Mobile backhaul, and packet optical transport. The aggregation, Mobile backhaul, and packet optical transport. The
 End of changes. 4 change blocks. 
7 lines changed or deleted 7 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.41. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/