draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-04.txt   draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-05.txt 
MPLS Working Group H. Sitaraman MPLS Working Group H. Sitaraman
Internet-Draft V. Beeram Internet-Draft V. Beeram
Intended status: Standards Track Juniper Networks Intended status: Standards Track Juniper Networks
Expires: April 11, 2019 T. Parikh Expires: April 18, 2019 T. Parikh
Verizon Verizon
T. Saad T. Saad
Cisco Systems Cisco Systems
October 8, 2018 October 15, 2018
Signaling RSVP-TE tunnels on a shared MPLS forwarding plane Signaling RSVP-TE tunnels on a shared MPLS forwarding plane
draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-04.txt draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-05.txt
Abstract Abstract
As the scale of MPLS RSVP-TE networks has grown, so the number of As the scale of MPLS RSVP-TE networks has grown, so the number of
Label Switched Paths (LSPs) supported by individual network elements Label Switched Paths (LSPs) supported by individual network elements
has increased. Various implementation recommendations have been has increased. Various implementation recommendations have been
proposed to manage the resulting increase in control plane state. proposed to manage the resulting increase in control plane state.
However, those changes have had no effect on the number of labels However, those changes have had no effect on the number of labels
that a transit Label Switching Router (LSR) has to support in the that a transit Label Switching Router (LSR) has to support in the
skipping to change at page 2, line 20 skipping to change at page 2, line 20
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on April 11, 2019. This Internet-Draft will expire on April 18, 2019.
Copyright Notice Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved. document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents publication of this document. Please review these documents
skipping to change at page 19, line 11 skipping to change at page 19, line 11
rsvp-te-parameters. This registry currently does not include Label rsvp-te-parameters. This registry currently does not include Label
Sub-object Flags. This document requests the addition of a new sub- Sub-object Flags. This document requests the addition of a new sub-
registry for Label Sub-object Flags as shown below. registry for Label Sub-object Flags as shown below.
Flag Name Reference Flag Name Reference
0x1 Global Label RFC 3209 0x1 Global Label RFC 3209
TBD1 TE Link Label [This.ID] (Section 9.3) TBD1 TE Link Label [This.ID] (Section 9.3)
TBD2 Delegation Label [This.ID] (Section 9.5) TBD2 Delegation Label [This.ID] (Section 9.5)
All assignments in this sub-registry are to be performed via
Standards Action.
13.4. Error Codes and Error Values 13.4. Error Codes and Error Values
IANA maintains a registry called "Resource Reservation Protocol IANA maintains a registry called "Resource Reservation Protocol
(RSVP) Parameters" with a subregistry called "Error Codes and (RSVP) Parameters" with a subregistry called "Error Codes and
Globally-Defined Error Value Sub-Codes". Within this subregistry Globally-Defined Error Value Sub-Codes". Within this subregistry
there is a definition of the "Routing Problem" error code with error there is a definition of the "Routing Problem" error code with error
code value 24. The definition lists a number of error values that code value 24. The definition lists a number of error values that
may be used with this error code. IANA is requested to allocate may be used with this error code. IANA is requested to allocate
further error values for use with this error code as described in further error values for use with this error code as described in
this document. The resulting entry in the registry should look as this document. The resulting entry in the registry should look as
 End of changes. 5 change blocks. 
4 lines changed or deleted 7 lines changed or added

This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/