--- 1/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-10.txt 2019-10-21 03:13:15.864226362 -0700 +++ 2/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-11.txt 2019-10-21 03:13:15.892227072 -0700 @@ -1,24 +1,26 @@ OSPF Working Group X. Xu Internet-Draft Alibaba Inc Intended status: Standards Track S. Kini -Expires: April 6, 2020 +Expires: April 23, 2020 P. Psenak C. Filsfils S. Litkowski - Cisco - October 4, 2019 + Cisco Systems, Inc. + M. Bocci + Nokia + October 21, 2019 Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label-stack Depth Using OSPF - draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-10 + draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-11 Abstract Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) has defined a mechanism to load- balance traffic flows using Entropy Labels (EL). An ingress Label Switching Router (LSR) cannot insert ELs for packets going into a given tunnel unless an egress LSR has indicated via signaling that it has the capability to process ELs, referred to as Entropy Label Capability (ELC), on that tunnel. In addition, it would be useful for ingress LSRs to know each LSR's capability of reading the maximum @@ -45,21 +47,21 @@ Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." - This Internet-Draft will expire on April 6, 2020. + This Internet-Draft will expire on April 23, 2020. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents @@ -74,24 +76,25 @@ 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Advertising ELC Using OSPF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1. Advertising ELC Using OSPFv2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.2. Advertising ELC Using OSPFv3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4. Advertising ERLD Using OSPF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5. Signaling ELC and ERLD in BGP-LS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 - 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 - Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 + 9. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 + 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 + 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 + 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 + Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1. Introduction [RFC6790] describes a method to load-balance Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) traffic flows using Entropy Labels (EL). It also introduces the concept of Entropy Label Capability (ELC) and defines the signaling of this capability via MPLS signaling protocols. Recently, mechanisms have been defined to signal labels via link- state Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP) such as OSPF [I-D.ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions]. In such scenarios, the @@ -216,44 +219,68 @@ The security considerations as described in [RFC7770] and [I-D.ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label] are applicable to this document. Incorrectly setting the E flag (ELC capable) (during origination, inter-area advertisement or redistribution) may lead to black-holing of the traffic on the egress node. Incorrectly setting of the ERLD value may lead to poor load-balancing of the traffic. -9. References +9. Contributors -9.1. Normative References + The following people contributed to the content of this document and + should be considered as co-authors: + + Gunter Van de Velde (editor) + Nokia + Antwerp + BE + + Email: gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com + + Wim Henderickx + Nokia + Belgium + + Email: wim.henderickx@nokia.com + + Keyur Patel + Arrcus + USA + + Email: keyur@arrcus.com + +10. References + +10.1. Normative References [BCP14] , . [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext] Previdi, S., Talaulikar, K., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., and M. Chen, "BGP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-16 (work in progress), June 2019. [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd] Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Talaulikar, K., Mirsky, G., and N. Triantafillis, "Signaling MSD (Maximum SID Depth) using Border Gateway Protocol Link-State", draft-ietf-idr- - bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-08 (work in progress), - September 2019. + bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-09 (work in progress), October + 2019. [I-D.ietf-isis-mpls-elc] Xu, X., Kini, S., Psenak, P., Filsfils, C., and S. Litkowski, "Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS", draft-ietf-isis-mpls- - elc-08 (work in progress), September 2019. + elc-09 (work in progress), October 2019. [I-D.ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label] Kini, S., Kompella, K., Sivabalan, S., Litkowski, S., Shakir, R., and J. Tantsura, "Entropy label for SPRING tunnels", draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12 (work in progress), July 2018. [I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-mpls] Bashandy, A., Filsfils, C., Previdi, S., Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., and R. Shakir, "Segment Routing with MPLS @@ -292,42 +319,59 @@ [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, . [RFC8476] Tantsura, J., Chunduri, U., Aldrin, S., and P. Psenak, "Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using OSPF", RFC 8476, DOI 10.17487/RFC8476, December 2018, . -9.2. Informative References +10.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions] Psenak, P., Previdi, S., Filsfils, C., Gredler, H., Shakir, R., Henderickx, W., and J. Tantsura, "OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing", draft-ietf-ospf-segment- routing-extensions-27 (work in progress), December 2018. Authors' Addresses Xiaohu Xu Alibaba Inc Email: xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com Sriganesh Kini Email: sriganeshkini@gmail.com Peter Psenak - Cisco + Cisco Systems, Inc. + Eurovea Centre, Central 3 + Pribinova Street 10 + Bratislava 81109 + Slovakia Email: ppsenak@cisco.com + Clarence Filsfils - Cisco + Cisco Systems, Inc. + Brussels + Belgium Email: cfilsfil@cisco.com - Stephane Litkowski - Cisco + Cisco Systems, Inc. + La Rigourdiere + Cesson Sevigne + France - Email: sslitkows@cisco.com + Email: slitkows@cisco.com + + Matthew Bocci + Nokia + Shoppenhangers Road + Maidenhead, Berks + UK + + Email: matthew.bocci@nokia.com