draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-16.txt | draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-17.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
skipping to change at page 1, line 15 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 15 ¶ | |||
Updates: 7370 (if approved) Cisco Systems | Updates: 7370 (if approved) Cisco Systems | |||
Intended status: Standards Track A. Bashandy | Intended status: Standards Track A. Bashandy | |||
Expires: December 20, 2021 Individual | Expires: December 20, 2021 Individual | |||
B. Decraene | B. Decraene | |||
Orange | Orange | |||
Z. Hu | Z. Hu | |||
Huawei Technologies | Huawei Technologies | |||
June 18, 2021 | June 18, 2021 | |||
IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing over IPv6 Dataplane | IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing over IPv6 Dataplane | |||
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-16 | draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-17 | |||
Abstract | Abstract | |||
The Segment Routing (SR) architecture allows flexible definition of | The Segment Routing (SR) architecture allows flexible definition of | |||
the end-to-end path by encoding it as a sequence of topological | the end-to-end path by encoding it as a sequence of topological | |||
elements called "segments". It can be implemented over the MPLS or | elements called "segments". It can be implemented over the MPLS or | |||
the IPv6 data plane. This document describes the IS-IS extensions | the IPv6 data plane. This document describes the IS-IS extensions | |||
required to support Segment Routing over the IPv6 data plane. | required to support Segment Routing over the IPv6 data plane. | |||
This document updates RFC 7370 by modifying an existing registry. | This document updates RFC 7370 by modifying an existing registry. | |||
skipping to change at page 17, line 23 ¶ | skipping to change at page 17, line 23 ¶ | |||
ISIS SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV MUST NOT appear more than once in | ISIS SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV MUST NOT appear more than once in | |||
its parent Sub-TLV. If it appears more than once in its parent Sub- | its parent Sub-TLV. If it appears more than once in its parent Sub- | |||
TLV, the parent Sub-TLV MUST be ignored by the receiver. | TLV, the parent Sub-TLV MUST be ignored by the receiver. | |||
The sum of all four sizes advertised in ISIS SRv6 SID Structure Sub- | The sum of all four sizes advertised in ISIS SRv6 SID Structure Sub- | |||
Sub-TLV MUST be less than or equal to 128 bits. If the sum of all | Sub-TLV MUST be less than or equal to 128 bits. If the sum of all | |||
four sizes advertised in the ISIS SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV is | four sizes advertised in the ISIS SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV is | |||
larger than 128 bits, the parent Sub-TLV MUST be ignored by the | larger than 128 bits, the parent Sub-TLV MUST be ignored by the | |||
receiver. | receiver. | |||
The SRv6 SID Sub-Sub-TLV is intended for informational use by the | The SRv6 SID Structure Sub-Sub-TLV is intended for informational use | |||
control and management planes. It MUST NOT be used at a transit node | by the control and management planes. It MUST NOT be used at a | |||
(as defined in [RFC8754]) for forwarding packets. As an example, | transit node (as defined in [RFC8754]) for forwarding packets. As an | |||
this information could be used for: | example, this information could be used for: | |||
o validation of SRv6 SIDs being instantiated in the network and | o validation of SRv6 SIDs being instantiated in the network and | |||
advertised via ISIS. These can be learnt by controllers via BGP- | advertised via ISIS. These can be learnt by controllers via BGP- | |||
LS and then be monitored for conformance to the SRv6 SID | LS and then be monitored for conformance to the SRv6 SID | |||
allocation scheme chosen by the operator as described in | allocation scheme chosen by the operator as described in | |||
Section 3.2 of [RFC8986]. | Section 3.2 of [RFC8986]. | |||
o verification and the automation for securing the SRv6 domain by | o verification and the automation for securing the SRv6 domain by | |||
provisioning filtering rules at SR domain boundaries as described | provisioning filtering rules at SR domain boundaries as described | |||
in Section 5 of [RFC8754]. | in Section 5 of [RFC8754]. | |||
End of changes. 2 change blocks. | ||||
5 lines changed or deleted | 5 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.48. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |