draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-34.txt | draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-35.txt | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
IS-IS Working Group S. Litkowski | IS-IS Working Group S. Litkowski | |||
Internet-Draft Orange | Internet-Draft Orange | |||
Intended status: Standards Track D. Yeung | Intended status: Standards Track D. Yeung | |||
Expires: July 25, 2019 Arrcus, Inc | Expires: September 8, 2019 Arrcus, Inc | |||
A. Lindem | A. Lindem | |||
Cisco Systems | Cisco Systems | |||
J. Zhang | J. Zhang | |||
Juniper Networks | Juniper Networks | |||
L. Lhotka | L. Lhotka | |||
CZ.NIC | CZ.NIC | |||
January 21, 2019 | March 7, 2019 | |||
YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol | YANG Data Model for IS-IS Protocol | |||
draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-34 | draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-35 | |||
Abstract | Abstract | |||
This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure | This document defines a YANG data model that can be used to configure | |||
and manage IS-IS protocol on network elements. | and manage IS-IS protocol on network elements. | |||
Requirements Language | Requirements Language | |||
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", | |||
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and | "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and | |||
skipping to change at page 1, line 46 ¶ | skipping to change at page 1, line 46 ¶ | |||
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 25, 2019. | This Internet-Draft will expire on September 8, 2019. | |||
Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect | |||
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must | to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must | |||
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of | include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of | |||
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as | the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as | |||
described in the Simplified BSD License. | described in the Simplified BSD License. | |||
Table of Contents | Table of Contents | |||
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 | |||
2. Design of the Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | 2. Design of the Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 | |||
2.1. IS-IS Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | 2.1. IS-IS Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
2.2. Multi-topology Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | 2.2. Multi-topology Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 | |||
2.3. Per-Level Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | 2.3. Per-Level Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 | |||
2.4. Per-Interface Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 | 2.4. Per-Interface Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 | |||
2.5. Authentication Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | 2.5. Authentication Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | |||
2.6. IGP/LDP synchronization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | 2.6. IGP/LDP synchronization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | |||
2.7. ISO parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | 2.7. ISO parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | |||
2.8. IP FRR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | 2.8. IP FRR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 | |||
2.9. Operational States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | 2.9. Operational States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | |||
3. RPC Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | 3. RPC Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | |||
4. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 | 4. Notifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 | |||
5. Interaction with Other YANG Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 | 5. Interaction with Other YANG Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | |||
6. IS-IS YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 | 6. IS-IS YANG Module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 | |||
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 | 7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 | |||
8. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 | 8. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 | |||
9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 | 9. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 | |||
10. Change log for ietf-isis YANG module . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 | 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 | |||
10.1. From version -29 to version -30 . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 | 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 | |||
10.2. From version -28 to version -29 . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 | 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 | |||
10.3. From version -27 to version -28 . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 | Appendix A. Example of IS-IS configuration in XML . . . . . . . 108 | |||
10.4. From version -26 to version -27 . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 | Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 | |||
10.5. From version -25 to version -26 . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 | ||||
10.6. From version -24 to version -25 . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 | ||||
10.7. From version -22 to version -24 . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 | ||||
10.8. From version -21 to version -22 . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 | ||||
10.9. From version -20 to version -21 . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 | ||||
10.10. From version -19 to version -20 . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 | ||||
10.11. From version -18 to version -19 . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 | ||||
10.12. From version -17 to version -18 . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 | ||||
10.13. From version -16 to version -17 . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 | ||||
10.14. From version -15 to version -16 . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 | ||||
10.15. From version -14 to version -15 . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 | ||||
10.16. From version -13 to version -14 . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 | ||||
10.17. From version -12 to version -13 . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 | ||||
10.18. From version -09 to version -12 . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 | ||||
10.19. From version -08 to version -09 . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 | ||||
10.20. From version -07 to version -08 . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 | ||||
10.21. From version -05 to version -07 . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 | ||||
10.22. From version -03 to version -05 . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 | ||||
10.23. From version -02 to version -03 . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 | ||||
10.24. From version -01 to version -02 . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 | ||||
10.25. From version -00 to version -01 . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 | ||||
11. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 | ||||
11.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 | ||||
11.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 | ||||
Appendix A. Example of IS-IS configuration in XML . . . . . . . 116 | ||||
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 | ||||
1. Introduction | 1. Introduction | |||
This document defines a YANG ([RFC7950]) data model for IS-IS routing | This document defines a YANG ([RFC7950]) data model for IS-IS routing | |||
protocol. | protocol. | |||
The data model covers configuration of an IS-IS routing protocol | The data model covers configuration of an IS-IS routing protocol | |||
instance as well as operational states. | instance as well as operational states. | |||
A simplified tree representation of the data model is presented in | A simplified tree representation of the data model is presented in | |||
skipping to change at page 23, line 44 ¶ | skipping to change at page 22, line 47 ¶ | |||
[I-D.ietf-bfd-yang]. | [I-D.ietf-bfd-yang]. | |||
6. IS-IS YANG Module | 6. IS-IS YANG Module | |||
The following RFCs, drafts and external standards are not referenced | The following RFCs, drafts and external standards are not referenced | |||
in the document text but are referenced in the ietf-isis.yang module: | in the document text but are referenced in the ietf-isis.yang module: | |||
[ISO-10589], [RFC1195], [RFC5029], [RFC5130], [RFC5305], [RFC5306], | [ISO-10589], [RFC1195], [RFC5029], [RFC5130], [RFC5305], [RFC5306], | |||
[RFC5308], [RFC5880], [RFC5881], [RFC6119], [RFC6232], [RFC7794], | [RFC5308], [RFC5880], [RFC5881], [RFC6119], [RFC6232], [RFC7794], | |||
[RFC7810], [RFC7917], [RFC8405]. | [RFC7810], [RFC7917], [RFC8405]. | |||
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-ospf@2019-01-24.yang" | <CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-isis@2019-03-07.yang" | |||
module ietf-isis { | module ietf-isis { | |||
yang-version 1.1; | yang-version 1.1; | |||
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-isis"; | namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-isis"; | |||
prefix isis; | prefix isis; | |||
import ietf-routing { | import ietf-routing { | |||
prefix "rt"; | prefix "rt"; | |||
reference "RFC 8349 - A YANG Data Model for Routing | reference "RFC 8349 - A YANG Data Model for Routing | |||
Management (NMDA Version)"; | Management (NMDA Version)"; | |||
} | } | |||
import ietf-inet-types { | import ietf-inet-types { | |||
prefix inet; | prefix inet; | |||
skipping to change at page 26, line 18 ¶ | skipping to change at page 25, line 20 ¶ | |||
see the RFC itself for full legal notices. | see the RFC itself for full legal notices. | |||
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', | The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL', | |||
'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', | 'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED', | |||
'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document | 'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document | |||
are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] | are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] | |||
[RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, | [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, | |||
as shown here. | as shown here. | |||
"; | "; | |||
revision 2019-01-24 { | revision 2019-03-07 { | |||
description | description | |||
"Initial revision."; | "Initial revision."; | |||
reference "RFC XXXX"; | reference "RFC XXXX"; | |||
} | } | |||
/* Identities */ | /* Identities */ | |||
identity isis { | identity isis { | |||
base rt:routing-protocol; | base rt:routing-protocol; | |||
description "Identity for the IS-IS routing protocol."; | description "Identity for the IS-IS routing protocol."; | |||
skipping to change at page 105, line 39 ¶ | skipping to change at page 104, line 39 ¶ | |||
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace | XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace | |||
This document also requests one new YANG module name in the YANG | This document also requests one new YANG module name in the YANG | |||
Module Names registry ([RFC6020]) with the following suggestion: | Module Names registry ([RFC6020]) with the following suggestion: | |||
name: ietf-isis | name: ietf-isis | |||
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-isis | namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-isis | |||
prefix: isis | prefix: isis | |||
reference: RFC XXXX | reference: RFC XXXX | |||
10. Change log for ietf-isis YANG module | 10. References | |||
10.1. From version -29 to version -30 | ||||
o Set a maximum-length of 255 for the non-best-reason leaf. | ||||
o Updated some descriptions. | ||||
o Renamed "level-db" container to "levels" for consistency reasons. | ||||
o Added some RFC references in the YANG model. | ||||
o Leaf default-metric of container prefix-ipv4-std is now a | ||||
container. | ||||
o Changed the description of the authentication and removed the | ||||
reference to MD5 as a possible way to hide the password. | ||||
o Changed leaf type for authentication type within | ||||
tlv10-authentication container. Moved from string to | ||||
keychain:crypto-algorithm identity. | ||||
o Some admin strings are now limited to a range of 1..255. | ||||
o Hostname string in hostname DB is limited to 255 as per RFC5301. | ||||
o In FRR stats, "prefix" is now encoded as inet:ip-prefix rather | ||||
than a string. "alternate" is now encoded as ip-address. | ||||
10.2. From version -28 to version -29 | ||||
o Fixed area-address type pattern. The authorized number of bytes | ||||
was wrong. | ||||
10.3. From version -27 to version -28 | ||||
o Fixed inaccurate description of level-type leaf. | ||||
10.4. From version -26 to version -27 | ||||
o Fixed XPATH to switching-capability leaf in "when" statement of | ||||
psc-specific and tdm-specific containers. | ||||
10.5. From version -25 to version -26 | ||||
o Modify BFD reference descriptions. | ||||
o Fix indentation. | ||||
o "uses interface-state" was missing. | ||||
10.6. From version -24 to version -25 | ||||
o RPC clear-adjacency uses now an interface reference instead of a | ||||
string. | ||||
o Use expanded "address-family" rather than "af" in the model. | ||||
o Fix pattern for area-address. | ||||
o Removed unnecessary identities. | ||||
o Added an instances container and list in the modeling of neighbors | ||||
in the LSDB. This is to manage the case where there are parallel | ||||
links between two neighbors. | ||||
o Notification instance header: removed routing-instance leaf | ||||
(alignment with OSPF). | ||||
o Notification instance header: changed routing-protocol-name to a | ||||
reference. | ||||
o Notification interface header: changed interface to a reference. | ||||
o RPCs: changed instance-state-ref typedef to a leafref. Removed | ||||
associated typedef. | ||||
o Revised some groupings and their names (alignment with OSPF). | ||||
o Some description alignment with OSPF. | ||||
o auto-cost container alignment with OSPF. | ||||
o MT-ID leaf in database description renamed (lower-case) mt-id. | ||||
o In the lsp-log grouping, leaf change is renamed reason to align | ||||
with OSPF. | ||||
o Added some link attributes (GMPLS, TE, extended TE, SRLGs) in the | ||||
LSDB. | ||||
o Added extended-system-id typedef which contains the system-id plus | ||||
the pseudonode number. | ||||
o Add support of POI Purge Originator Identification. | ||||
10.7. From version -22 to version -24 | ||||
o Fix revision date of the module. | ||||
10.8. From version -21 to version -22 | ||||
o TE router-id modeling alignment with OSPF. | ||||
o Add max-ecmp + feature in spf-control container (alignment with | ||||
OSPF). | ||||
10.9. From version -20 to version -21 | ||||
o Model revision date fix | ||||
10.10. From version -19 to version -20 | ||||
o Moved to Yang 1.1 | ||||
o Lower case enumerations | ||||
o Add RFC references to features | ||||
o Remove segment-routing feature | ||||
o Modified BFD activation modeling | ||||
10.11. From version -18 to version -19 | ||||
o Align with draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis. | ||||
o Modify address family types as per draft-ietf-rtgwg-routing-types- | ||||
17. | ||||
10.12. From version -17 to version -18 | ||||
o NMDA compliancy. | ||||
o Set some default values. | ||||
o Align with iana-rt-types module. | ||||
10.13. From version -16 to version -17 | ||||
o Cosmetic fixes. | ||||
o Use of rt-types model. | ||||
10.14. From version -15 to version -16 | ||||
o Alignment with last IETF key chain model. | ||||
o lsp-log "change" leaf moved as an identity. | ||||
o Incremental SPF removed from spf-log types. | ||||
10.15. From version -14 to version -15 | ||||
o Alignment with OSPF model done: | ||||
* Added spf-control container with IETF SPF delay algorithm as a | ||||
feature. | ||||
* Added graceful-restart options. | ||||
* Added nsr as a feature. | ||||
* Removed per topology FRR. Need to be augmented if necessary. | ||||
* Created an ldp container within mpls. | ||||
* Renamed igp-ldp-sync to igp-sync. | ||||
* Added auto-cost container. | ||||
* Moved reference-bandwidth under auto-cost container. | ||||
* Added IS-IS local RIB as operational state. | ||||
* Added decode-completed and raw-data leaves in the LSDB model. | ||||
* Modified the notification header. | ||||
10.16. From version -13 to version -14 | ||||
o Segment Routing extensions are now in a separate document. | ||||
10.17. From version -12 to version -13 | ||||
o Move feature nlpid-control to container rather than list. | ||||
o Rename multi-topology to topologies to align with OSPF. | ||||
o Rename bfd/enabled to bfd/enable for consistency reason. | ||||
o Add support for NSR with a feature. | ||||
10.18. From version -09 to version -12 | ||||
o Rename node-tag container to node-tags. | ||||
10.19. From version -08 to version -09 | ||||
o Added container before af list. | ||||
o Added container before topology list. | ||||
o Aligned LFA if per level cfg. | ||||
o Align to draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-23. | ||||
10.20. From version -07 to version -08 | ||||
o Remove selector from system-id type. | ||||
o Add some default values. | ||||
o Moved lists to containers and groupings for per level | ||||
configuration. | ||||
o Remove routing-instance as per core routing model v21. | ||||
o added BFD leaf (no more BFD protocol model). | ||||
o changed keychain module reference. | ||||
10.21. From version -05 to version -07 | ||||
o Move Overload config from list to container. | ||||
o Move Overload-max-metric config from list to container. | ||||
o Move preference config from list to container. | ||||
o Add Node flag in config. | ||||
o Removed BFD config => moved to isis-bfd module. | ||||
o Remove call to routing policy model. | ||||
10.22. From version -03 to version -05 | ||||
o Correct invalid references to previous versions of core routing | ||||
model. | ||||
o Remove BFD config and replace by groupings from ietf-bfd. | ||||
o Adding routing-policy support through routing-policy model. | ||||
10.23. From version -02 to version -03 | ||||
o Reviewed config and op state groupings. | ||||
o Add default value to lfa candidate-disabled. | ||||
o Add enable leaf to isis container to reflect admin state. | ||||
o Move to VRF centric only. | ||||
o Segment routing is part of a separate module. | ||||
10.24. From version -01 to version -02 | ||||
o Adding IPFRR. | ||||
o Adding igp-ldp-sync. | ||||
o Adding segment-routing. | ||||
o Adding instance reference to operational states. | ||||
o Move AF type from string to identity. | ||||
o Updated router-capability in LSDB description. | ||||
o packet counters moved to interface-packet-counters. | ||||
o Added modification information in lsp-log. | ||||
o Removing igp-ldp-sync timer in IS-IS. | ||||
o Defining hierarchy for operational states. | ||||
o Adding clns-mtu. | ||||
o Adding key-chain. | ||||
10.25. From version -00 to version -01 | ||||
o Interface metric move from af container to interface container. | ||||
o Hello-padding on interface moved to hello-padding-disable with | ||||
empty type. | ||||
o three-way-handshake removed. | ||||
o route preference changed to a choice. | ||||
o csnp-authentication/psnp-authentication merged to authentication | ||||
container. | ||||
o lsp-gen-interval-exp-delay removed. | ||||
o Added overload-max-metric feature. | ||||
o overload-max-metric is in a separate container. | ||||
o Change hello-padding to container. | ||||
o Change bfd to container. | ||||
o Make BFD a feature. | ||||
o Create mpls-te container and put router-id inside. | ||||
o Remove GR helper disable and timers. | ||||
11. References | ||||
11.1. Normative References | 10.1. Normative References | |||
[I-D.ietf-bfd-yang] | [I-D.ietf-bfd-yang] | |||
Rahman, R., Zheng, L., Jethanandani, M., Networks, J., and | Rahman, R., Zheng, L., Jethanandani, M., Networks, J., and | |||
G. Mirsky, "YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding | G. Mirsky, "YANG Data Model for Bidirectional Forwarding | |||
Detection (BFD)", draft-ietf-bfd-yang-17 (work in | Detection (BFD)", draft-ietf-bfd-yang-17 (work in | |||
progress), August 2018. | progress), August 2018. | |||
[ISO-10589] | [ISO-10589] | |||
ISO, , "Intermediate System to Intermediate System intra- | ISO, , "Intermediate System to Intermediate System intra- | |||
domain routing information exchange protocol for use in | domain routing information exchange protocol for use in | |||
skipping to change at page 116, line 9 ¶ | skipping to change at page 108, line 24 ¶ | |||
[RFC8405] Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., Gredler, H., Lindem, A., | [RFC8405] Decraene, B., Litkowski, S., Gredler, H., Lindem, A., | |||
Francois, P., and C. Bowers, "Shortest Path First (SPF) | Francois, P., and C. Bowers, "Shortest Path First (SPF) | |||
Back-Off Delay Algorithm for Link-State IGPs", RFC 8405, | Back-Off Delay Algorithm for Link-State IGPs", RFC 8405, | |||
DOI 10.17487/RFC8405, June 2018, <https://www.rfc- | DOI 10.17487/RFC8405, June 2018, <https://www.rfc- | |||
editor.org/info/rfc8405>. | editor.org/info/rfc8405>. | |||
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol | [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol | |||
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, | Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>. | |||
11.2. Informative References | 10.2. Informative References | |||
[RFC5443] Jork, M., Atlas, A., and L. Fang, "LDP IGP | [RFC5443] Jork, M., Atlas, A., and L. Fang, "LDP IGP | |||
Synchronization", RFC 5443, DOI 10.17487/RFC5443, March | Synchronization", RFC 5443, DOI 10.17487/RFC5443, March | |||
2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5443>. | 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5443>. | |||
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", | [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", | |||
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, | BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, | |||
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>. | <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>. | |||
Appendix A. Example of IS-IS configuration in XML | Appendix A. Example of IS-IS configuration in XML | |||
End of changes. 14 change blocks. | ||||
368 lines changed or deleted | 28 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ |