[Docs] [txt|pdf] [Tracker] [Email] [Diff1] [Diff2] [Nits]

Versions: 00 01 02

INTERNET-DRAFT                                                T. Herbert
Intended Status: Informational                                  Facebook


                                                       February 29, 2016


               Remote checksum offload for encapsulation
                   draft-herbert-remotecsumoffload-02


Abstract

   This document describes remote checksum offload for encapsulation,
   which is a mechanism that provides checksum offload of encapsulated
   packets using rudimentary offload capabilities found in most Network
   Interface Card (NIC) devices. The outer header checksum e.g. that in
   UDP or GRE) is enabled in packets and, with some additional meta
   information, a receiver is able to deduce the checksum to be set for
   an inner encapsulated packet. Effectively this offloads the
   computation of the inner checksum. Enabling the outer checksum in
   encapsulation has the additional advantage that it covers more of the
   packet than the inner checksum including the encapsulation headers.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted to IETF in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups.  Note that
   other groups may also distribute working documents as
   Internet-Drafts.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/1id-abstracts.html

   The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at
   http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html


Copyright and License Notice




Herbert                Expires September 1, 2016                [Page 1]


INTERNET DRAFT          Remote Checksum Offload        February 29, 2016


   Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors. All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document. Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.



Table of Contents

   1  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
   2 Checksum offload background  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     2.1 The Internet checksum  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  3
     2.2 Transmit checksum offload  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
       2.2.1 Generic transmit offload . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
       2.2.2 Local checksum offload . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  4
       2.2.3 Protocol specific transmit offload . . . . . . . . . . .  5
     2.3 Receive checksum offload . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  5
       2.3.1 CHECKSUM_COMPLETE  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
       2.3.2 CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.0 Remote checksum offload  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.1 Option format  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  6
     3.2 Transmit operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  7
     3.3 Receiver operation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  8
     3.4 Interaction with TCP segmentation offload  . . . . . . . . .  9
   4  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   5  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
   6  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     6.1  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  9
     6.2  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
   Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10













Herbert                Expires September 1, 2016                [Page 2]


INTERNET DRAFT          Remote Checksum Offload        February 29, 2016


1  Introduction

   Checksum offload is a capability of NICs where the checksum
   calculation for a transport layer packet (TCP, UDP, etc.) is
   performed by a device on behalf of the host stack. Checksum offload
   is applicable to both transmit and receive, where on transmit the
   device writes the computed checksum into the packet, and on receive
   the device provides the computed checksum of the packet or an
   indication that specific transport checksums were validated. This
   feature saves CPU cycles in the host and has become ubiquitous in
   modern NICs.

   A host may both source transport packets and encapsulate them for
   transit over an underlying network. In this case checksum offload is
   still desirable, but now must be done on an encapsulated packet. Many
   deployed NICs are only capable of providing checksum offload for
   simple TCP or UDP packets. Such NICs typically use protocol specific
   mechanisms where they must parse headers in order to perform checksum
   calculations. Updating these NICs to perform checksum offload for
   encapsulation requires new parsing logic which is likely infeasible
   or at cost prohibitive.

   In this specification we describe an alternative that uses
   rudimentary NIC offload features to support offloading checksum
   calculation of encapsulated packets. In this design, the outer
   checksum is enabled on transmit, and meta information indicating the
   location of the checksum field being offloaded and its starting point
   for computation are sent with a packet. On receipt, after the outer
   checksum is verified, the receiver sets the offloaded checksum field
   per the computed packet checksum and the meta data.

2 Checksum offload background

   In this section we provide some background into checksum offload
   operation.

2.1 The Internet checksum

   The Internet checksum [RFC0791] is used by several Internet protocols
   including IP [RFC1122], TCP [RFC0793], UDP [RFC0768] and GRE
   [RFC2784]. Efficient checksum calculation is critical to good
   performance [RFC1071], and the mathematical properties are useful in
   incrementally updating checksums [RFC1624]. An early approach to
   implementing checksum offload in hardware is described in [RFC1936].

   TCP and UDP checksums cover a pseudo header which is composed of the
   source and destination addresses of the corresponding IP packet,
   upper layer packet length, and protocol. The checksum pseudo header



Herbert                Expires September 1, 2016                [Page 3]


INTERNET DRAFT          Remote Checksum Offload        February 29, 2016


   is defined in [RFC0768] and [RFC0793] for IPv4, and in [RFC2460] for
   IPv6.

2.2 Transmit checksum offload

   In transmit checksum offload, a host network stack defers the
   calculation and setting of a transport checksum in the packet to the
   device. A device may provide checksum offload only for specific
   protocols, or may provide a generic interface. In either case,
   support for only one offloaded checksum per packet is typical.

   When using transmit checksum offload, a host stack must initialize
   the checksum field in the packet. This is done by setting to zero
   (GRE) or to the bitwise not of the pseudo header (UDP or TCP). The
   device proceeds by computing the packet checksum from the start of
   the transport header through to the end of the packet. The bitwise
   not of the resulting value is written in the checksum field of the
   transport packet.

2.2.1 Generic transmit offload

   A device can provide a generic interface for transmit checksum
   offload. Checksum offload is enabled by setting two fields in the
   transmit descriptor for a packet: start offset and checksum offset.
   The start offset indicates the byte in the packet where the checksum
   calculation should start. The checksum offset indicates the offset in
   the packet where the checksum value is to be written.

   The generic interface is protocol agnostic, however only supports one
   offloaded checksum per packet. While it is conceivable that a NIC
   could provide offload for more checksums by defining more than one
   checksum start/offset pair in the transmit descriptor, a more general
   and efficient solution is Local Checksum Offload.

2.2.2 Local checksum offload

   Local Checksum Offload [LCO] (or LCO) is a technique for efficiently
   computing the outer checksum of an encapsulated datagram when the
   inner checksum is due to be offloaded. The ones-complement sum of a
   correctly checksummed TCP or UDP packet is equal to the sum of the
   pseudo header, since everything else gets 'cancelled out' by the
   checksum field.  This property holds since the sum was complemented
   before being written to the checksum field. More generally, this
   holds in any case where the Internet one's complement checksum is
   used, and thus any checksum that generic transmit offload supports.
   That is, if we have set up transmit checksum offload with a
   start/offset pair, we know that after the device has filled in that
   checksum the one's complement sum from checksum start to the end of



Herbert                Expires September 1, 2016                [Page 4]


INTERNET DRAFT          Remote Checksum Offload        February 29, 2016


   the packet will be equal to whatever value is set in the checksum
   field beforehand.  This property allows computing the outer checksum
   without considering at the payload per the algorithm:

      1) Compute the checksum from the outer packet's checksum start
         offset to the inner packet's checksum start offset.

      2) Add the bit-wise not of the pseudo header checksum for the
         inner packet.

      3) The result is the checksum from the outer packet's start offset
         to the end of the packet. Taking into account the pseudo header
         for the outer checksum allows the outer checksum field to be
         set without offload processing.

   Step 1) requires that some checksum calculation is performed on the
   host stack, however this is only done over some portion of packet
   headers which is typically much smaller than the payload of the
   packet.

   LCO can be used for nested encapsulations; in this case, the outer
   encapsulation layer will sum over both its own header and the
   'middle' header.  Thus, if the device has the capability to offload
   an inner checksum in encapsulation, any number of outer checksums can
   be efficiently calculated using this technique.

2.2.3 Protocol specific transmit offload

   Some devices support transmit checksum offload for very specific
   protocols. For instance, many legacy devices can only perform
   checksum offload for UDP/IP and TCP/IP packets. These devices parse
   transmitted packets in order to determine the checksum start and
   checksum offset. They may also ignore the value in the checksum field
   by setting it to zero for checksum computation and computing the
   checksum of the pseudo header themselves.

   Protocol specific transmit offload is limited to the protocols a
   device supports. To support checksum offload of an encapsulated
   packet, a device must be a able to parse the encapsulation layer in
   order to locate the inner packet.

2.3 Receive checksum offload

   Upon receiving a packet, a device may perform a checksum calculation
   over the packet or part of the packet depending on the protocol. A
   result of this calculation is returned in the meta data of the
   receive descriptor for the packet. The host stack can apply the
   result in verifying checksums as it processes the packet. The intent



Herbert                Expires September 1, 2016                [Page 5]


INTERNET DRAFT          Remote Checksum Offload        February 29, 2016


   is that the offload will obviate the need for the networking stack to
   perform its own checksum calculation over the packet.

   There are two basic methods of receive checksum offload:
   CHECKSUM_COMPLETE and CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY.

2.3.1 CHECKSUM_COMPLETE

   A device may calculate the checksum of a whole packet (layer 2
   payload) and return the resultant value to the host stack. The host
   stack can subsequently use this value to validate checksums in the
   packet. As the packet is parsed through various layers, the
   calculated checksum is updated to correspond to each layer (subtract
   out checksum for preceding bytes for a given header).

   CHECKSUM_COMPLETE is protocol agnostic and does not require any
   protocol awareness in the device. It works for any encapsulation and
   supports an arbitrary number of checksums in the packet.

2.3.2 CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY

   A device may explicitly validate a checksum in a packet and return a
   flag in the receive descriptor that a transport checksum has been
   verified (host performing checksum computation is unnecessary). Some
   devices may be capable of validating more than one checksum in the
   packet, in which case the device returns a count of the number
   verified. Typically, only a positive signal is returned, if the
   device was unable to validate a checksum it does not return any
   information and the host will generally perform its own checksum
   computation. If a device returns a count of validations, this must
   refer to consecutive checksums that are present and validated in a
   packet (checksums cannot be skipped).

   CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY is protocol specific, for instance in the case
   of UDP or TCP a device needs to consider the pseudo header in
   checksum validation. To support checksum offload of an encapsulated
   packet, a device must be able to parse the encapsulation layer in
   order to locate the inner packet.

3.0 Remote checksum offload

   This section describes the remote checksum offload mechanism. This is
   primarily useful with UDP based encapsulation where the UDP checksum
   is enabled (not set to zero on transmit). The same technique could be
   applied to GRE encapsulation where the GRE checksum is enabled.

3.1 Option format




Herbert                Expires September 1, 2016                [Page 6]


INTERNET DRAFT          Remote Checksum Offload        February 29, 2016


   Remote checksum offload requires the sending of optional data with an
   encapsulated packet. This data is a pair of checksum start and
   checksum offset values. More than one offloaded checksum could be
   supported if multiple pairs are sent.

   The logical data format for remote checksum offload is:

    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |        Checksum start         |       Checksum offset         |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

      o Checksum start: starting offset for checksum computation
        relative to the start of the encapsulated packet. This is
        typically the offset of a transport header (e.g. UDP or TCP).

      o Checksum offset: Offset relative to the start of the
        encapsulated packet where the derived checksum value is to be
        written. This typically is the offset of the checksum field in
        the transport header (e.g. UDP or TCP).

   Support for remote checksum offload with specific encapsulation
   protocols is outside the scope of this document, however any
   encapsulation format that supports some reasonable form of optional
   meta data should be amenable. In Generic UDP Encapsulation [GUE] this
   would entail defining an optional field, in Geneve [GENEVE] a TLV
   would be defined, for NSH [NSH] the meta data can either be in a
   service header or within a TLV. In any scenario, what the offsets in
   the meta data are relative to must be unambiguous.

3.2 Transmit operation

   The typical actions to set remote checksum offload on transmit are:

      1) Transport layer creates a packet and indicates in internal
         packet meta data that checksum is to be offloaded to the NIC
         (normal transport layer processing for checksum offload). The
         checksum field is populated with the bitwise not of the
         checksum of the pseudo header or zero as appropriate.

      2) Encapsulation layer adds its headers to the packet including
         the offload meta data. The start offset and checksum offset are
         set accordingly.

      3) Encapsulation layer arranges for checksum offload of the outer
         header checksum (e.g. UDP).




Herbert                Expires September 1, 2016                [Page 7]


INTERNET DRAFT          Remote Checksum Offload        February 29, 2016


      4) Packet is sent to the NIC. The NIC will perform transmit
         checksum offload and set the checksum field in the outer
         header. The inner header and rest of the packet are transmitted
         without modification.

3.3 Receiver operation

   The typical actions a host receiver does to support remote checksum
   offload are:

      1) Receive packet and validate outer checksum following normal
         processing (e.g. validate non-zero UDP checksum).

      2) Deduce full checksum for the IP packet. This is directly
         provided if device returns the packet checksum in
         CHECKSUM_COMPLETE. If the device returned CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY,
         then the complete checksum can be trivially derived as either
         zero (GRE) or the bitwise not of the outer pseudo header (UDP).

      3) From the packet checksum, subtract the checksum computed from
         the start of the packet (outer IP header) to the offset in the
         packet indicted by checksum start in the meta data. The result
         is the deduced checksum to set in the checksum field of the
         encapsulated transport packet.

         In pseudo code:

           csum: initialized to checksum computed from start (outer IP
                 header) to the end of the packet
           start_of_packet: address of start of packet
           encap_payload_offset: relative to start_of_packet
           csum_start: value from meta data
           checksum(start, len): function to compute checksum from start
                 address for len bytes

           csum -= checksum(start_of_packet, encap_payload_offset +
                            csum_start)

      4) Write the resultant checksum value into the packet at the
         offset provided by checksum offset in the meta data.

         In pseudo code:

           csum_offset: offset of checksum field

           *(start_of_packet + encap_payload_offset +
             csum_offset) = csum




Herbert                Expires September 1, 2016                [Page 8]


INTERNET DRAFT          Remote Checksum Offload        February 29, 2016


      5) Checksum is verified at the transport layer using normal
         processing. This should not require any checksum computation
         over the packet since the complete checksum has already been
         provided.

3.4 Interaction with TCP segmentation offload

   Remote checksum offload may be useful with TCP Segmentation Offload
   (TSO) in order to avoid host checksum calculations at the receiver.
   This can be implemented on a transmitter as follows:

      1) Host stack prepares a large segment for transmission including
         adding of encapsulation headers and the remote checksum option
         which refers to the encapsulated transport checksum in the
         large segment.

      2) TSO is performed by the device taking encapsulation into
         account. The outer checksum is computed and written for each
         packet. The inner checksum is not computed, and the
         encapsulation header (including checksum meta data) is
         replicated for each packet.

      3) At the receiver remote checksum offload processing occurs as
         normal for each packet.

4  Security Considerations

   Remote checksum offload should not impact protocol security.

5  IANA Considerations

   There are no IANA considerations in this specification. The remote
   checksum offload meta data may require an option number or type in
   specific encapsulation formats that support it.

6  References

6.1  Normative References

   [RFC0791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, September
             1981.

   [RFC1122] Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -
             Communication Layers", STD 3, RFC 1122, October 1989.

   [RFC0793] Postel, J., "Transmission Control Protocol", STD 7, RFC
             793, September 1981.




Herbert                Expires September 1, 2016                [Page 9]


INTERNET DRAFT          Remote Checksum Offload        February 29, 2016


   [RFC0768] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,
             August 1980.

   [RFC2784] Farinacci, D., Li, T., Hanks, S., Meyer, D., and P. Traina,
             "Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE)", RFC 2784, March
             2000.

   [RFC2460] Deering, S. and R. Hinden, "Internet Protocol, Version 6
             (IPv6) Specification", RFC 2460, December 1998.

6.2  Informative References

   [RFC1071] Braden, R., Borman, D., and C. Partridge, "Computing the
             Internet checksum", RFC1071, September 1988.

   [RFC1624] Rijsinghani, A., Ed., "Computation of the Internet Checksum
             via Incremental Update", RFC1624, May 1994.

   [RFC1936] Touch, J. and B. Parham, "Implementing the Internet
             Checksum in Hardware", RFC1936, April 1996.

   [GUE]     Herbert, T., Yong, L, and Zia, O., "Generic UDP
             Encapsulation". draft-ietf-nvo3-gue-02

   [GENEVE]  Gross, J. and Gango, I., "Geneve: Generic Network
             Virtualization Encapsulation", draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-01,
             January 1, 2016
   [NSH]     Quinn, P. and Elzur, U., "Network Service Header", draft-
             ietf-sfc-nsh-02.txt, January 19,2016

   [LOC]     Cree, E. Checksum Offloads in the Linux Networking Stack,
             Linux documentation:
             Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.txt

Authors' Addresses

   Tom Herbert
   Facebook
   1 Hacker Way
   Menlo Park, CA
   US

   EMail: tom@herbertland.com








Herbert                Expires September 1, 2016               [Page 10]


Html markup produced by rfcmarkup 1.129b, available from https://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/